Quote from: admin on July 01, 2014, 10:44:34 AMBut I guess aiming error is compensated with equivalent scope correction so that group center is on correct place?Quote from: mman on July 01, 2014, 09:12:33 AM
This input field allows you to move group center in relation to target, if that is what you meant?
Yes. I our case, at 300m, people aim with their telecopes at a white sticker 20cm below the electronic target center.
Quote from: mman on July 01, 2014, 09:12:33 AM
This input field allows you to move group center in relation to target, if that is what you meant?
Quote from: admin on June 30, 2014, 08:08:28 PM
would it be possible to include the effects of a hold over/under (and the horizontal equivalent)? (in combination with cant)
Quote from: 375CT on June 30, 2014, 08:55:22 PMYes, it is. I'll attach it later today.
Is this WEZ tool inlcuded in your Hit Prob spreadsheet? Asking because I'd like to ry it if you don't mind.
Quote from: 375CT on June 30, 2014, 08:55:22 PMThat's not the case. I calculated hit probability with two different methods:
LIked the idea of going Monte Carlo for the random sequence then using CEP for hit prob. Nice touch.
Quote from: 375CT on June 30, 2014, 08:55:22 PMOn dispersion factors field you define SD of group (all values are expressed in standard deviations). On group center bias field you define how far away in average group center is from target center.
Not quite clear the difference in the MV fields errors, any more detail will be kindly grateful.